Pros and cons of Fisher investments
Fisher Investments is a highly respected investment management company. Clients include Fortune 500 companies, foundations and endowments, as well as thousands of high net worth investors. Fisher Investments' Private Client Group was specifically created to allow the investment management company to deliver institutional level capabilities to high net worth individuals. Fisher founded Fisher Investments in 1979, which now manages over $45 billion for private clients and institutions. The firm is also prominent in both the UK and Germany. Here is a look at the pros and cons of Fisher investments.
Pros:
They focus in serving the needs of investors demanding superior performance, low fees and exceptional service. They focus on different kinds of investors; the individual investor and the institutional investor along with other great features for the client.
Individual Investor
Fisher Investments has a private portfolio management team that takes care of the individual investor. There are separate account money management and global investing for those high net worth individuals. There are dynamic portfolio management strategies that help maintain your each individual's portfolio. They bring customized service and low fees for each client.
Institutional Investors
Fisher also has an investment management group that is full scale and focuses mainly on the institutional investments with a number of strategies to get the best results. They serve major corporate and public pension plans, endowments and foundations. They also include groundbreaking capital market research and technology.
Fisher Investments has earned a great reputation for handling diverse investment needs of high net worth individuals. The firm is highly capable of managing a variety of international investment structures in a tax-sensitive environment, some of which include:
- Individual accounts
- Joint accounts
- Personal equity plans
- Individual savings account
- Self invested personal pensions
- Funded retirement benefit scheme
- Small self administered scheme
- Trusts
- Charitable trusts
- Corporate accounts
- Open ended investment company
- Generic offshore investments
Fisher investment advice
Fisher offers insight into the Fisher investments strategies. They have financial investment advice and education for a wide audience which is not only informative, but it is also very helpful in times of need.
Customized portfolios
Fisher believes in customizing every portfolio to meet the needs of the client. Fisher Investments' believe value in portfolio management is created by identifying new information and uniquely interpreting the information for every situation. Fisher Investments' performance data is monitored on a daily, weekly, monthly and quarterly basis, with individual positions in portfolios that are analyzed on an exception-reporting basis.
Cons
Employment
If you are thinking of getting a job with Fisher you may want to think twice.
There is an abnormally high turnover rate and many past employees have said that the management was inexperienced with an attitude of my way or the highway. The pressure to perform is very demanding and if you make one mistake you could be fired.
Investment councilors
Unlike other financial companies, some of Fisher's investments councilors don't carry active securities licenses. This could mean that their councilors may not have all the up to date information regarding investments and aren't actually legally supposed to give advice.
Rising stocks
With the rising stocks, this could mean rising fees for Fisher investments no matter what the performance may be.
Customized portfolios
Troubling questions have been raised concerning Fisher's advertised claims that they custom-tailor investor portfolios. According to various former clients and former employees interviewed by Business Week, Fisher's advertised promises have not held up. Disgruntled clients say Fisher's "customized portfolios" look very similar.
Whatever investment company you decide to go with, check out the pros and cons of Fisher investments. With years of experience and knowledge Fisher has been helping people for years with their investing needs. Like any financial company, Fisher has its pros and its cons. Take time to review all of them to see if Fisher is the right company for you!
I submitted a comment over ... (Below threshold)
Scott Barlow:
Avoid Fisher, buy into a va... (Below threshold)
Dr Lou Sertich:
Avoid Fisher, buy into a va... (Below threshold)
Dr Lou Sertich:
Please remove my earlier co... (Below threshold)
Dr Lou Sertich:
In view of Dr Lou Sertich l... (Below threshold)
EUGENE CONNER:
October 20, 20085:43 PM | Score: 8
I submitted a comment over 2 weeks ago, yet it still isn't posted. Do you only post comments that agree with your articles?
Posted by Scott Barlow| October 20, 20085:43 PM Score: Posted on October 20, 2008 17:43
January 20, 2009 11:26 AM | Score: 22
Avoid Fisher, buy into a vanguard or fidelity fund.
I invested 955k one year ago. It is now worth 552k. I know it's been e terrible year for the market, but their selling point was that they protect their clients in bear markets.They brag that their clients only lost 2 % in the last bear market. This time they sent a 23 page e-mail, explaining that they completely missed the market. For 1.5 % management fee, they simply track the market. An index fund would have done just as well, with 1/3 the costs. Even when I asked them to go defensive for me last October, they stuck with a 100% stocks, all the time approach.
Posted by Dr Lou Sertich| January 20, 2009 11:26 AM Score: Posted on January 20, 2009 11:26
January 20, 2009 11:27 AM | Score: 8
Avoid Fisher, buy into a vanguard or fidelity fund.
I invested 955k one year ago. It is now worth 552k. I know it's been e terrible year for the market, but their selling point was that they protect their clients in bear markets.They brag that their clients only lost 2 % in the last bear market. This time they sent a 23 page e-mail, explaining that they completely missed the market. For 1.5 % management fee, they simply track the market. An index fund would have done just as well, with 1/3 the costs. Even when I asked them to go defensive for me last October, they stuck with a 100% stocks, all the time approach.
Posted by Dr Lou Sertich| January 20, 2009 11:27 AM Score: Posted on January 20, 2009 11:27
January 22, 20097:21 AM | Score: 7
Please remove my earlier comments. I'm in the process of moving my money, and there are already repercussions.
Thanks.
Dr. Lou Sertich
Posted by Dr Lou Sertich| January 22, 20097:21 AM Score: Posted on January 22, 2009 07:21
December 18, 20099:01 AM | Score: 2
In view of Dr Lou Sertich lost of 60% of potfolio in less than two Years,How can FORBES MAG promote this company except the $ they are paying them to Adv this Company. As they say Buyer bewear, what a shame.
Posted by EUGENE CONNER| December 18, 20099:01 AM Score: Posted on December 18, 2009 09:01